Samsung Galaxy A35 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung has captured its position in the mid-range segment of the smartphones with A-series phones. The features offered by Samsung with budget prices in A-series phones are really solid. Here are two phones in the A-series series: Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and Samsung Galaxy A25 that provide the performance with affordability for the customer. Here’s an in-depth comparison of Samsung Galaxy A35 5G with Samsung Galaxy A25 based on various criteria.
Table of Contents:
- Size Comparison
- Display Comparison
- Battery Life
- Charging Speed
- Speaker Test
- Performance
- Benchmark Performance
- Camera Comparison
- Video Quality
- Verdict
Size Comparison
The two devices, Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and Galaxy A25 are built to provide optimal screen size for comfort and usability to the users. The A35 5G will have a little bit larger display than A25, although the physical size differences between the two are very minimal, making the devices really easy to hold in hands. The Galaxy A35 5G has approximately 159.9 x 75.8 x 8.4mm dimensions, which are identical with the dimensions for the A25, coming to 160 x 76 x 8.4 mm; hence both these phones come so close to dimensions. However the contours for Galaxy A35 5G a bit more sophisticated, giving them a much smoother look to grip it more organically. Although the sizes are very comparable, users prioritizing display may prefer the A35 5G slightly better for its increased screen size but for most customers, the real difference will feel minimal in most day-to-day use. The weight is roughly around 190g for both phones, which is manageable but not the lightest in the mid-range segment. Both devices are sleek, modern, with glossy finishes, but the A35 5G looks more modern with a slimmer profile than the A25.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 161.6 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm | 161 x 76.5 x 8.3 mm |
| Weight | 209 grams | 197 grams |
| Display Size | 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Display Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~85% | ~84% |
| Build | Plastic back, plastic frame | Plastic back, plastic frame |
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 boast an AMOLED display-the best benefit one might obtain in the mid-range. AMOLED presents more vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and contrast that makes it suitable for media consumption, games, and general use. But with both the devices differing regarding display size, resolution, and refresh rate, here is what each device brings. With a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED screen and a pixel density of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Galaxy A35 5G will display everything that’s on the phone bright and crystal clear. With the refresh rate hitting at 120Hz, animation and scrolling are highly smoothened, which turns highly useful for apps and games when somebody wants to have something fluid and fast in its execution. On the other hand, the Galaxy A25 comes with a 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display, which is a little smaller than that of the A35 5G. The resolution is the same at 1080 x 2400 pixels, but the refresh rate of the display is 90Hz which is therefore rather smooth but not that responsive compared to the A35 120Hz. Casual users do not care about this, but for media that demands fast motion, either games or any other stuff, the A35 5G is a better option. Good color accuracy, and the A35 5G edges it slightly in terms of refresh rate as compared to the other for brightness levels. es or any other stuff, the A35 5G is a better option. Great color accuracy, and while the A35 5G edges the rest by a teeny margin concerning refresh rate brightness levels.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Samsung Galaxy A25 |
|---|---|---|
| Display Size | 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| Display Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels (FHD+) | 1080 x 2340 pixels (FHD+) |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz |
| Pixel Density | ~390 PPI | ~396 PPI |
| Brightness | ~800 nits (typical) | ~800 nits (typical) |
| Aspect Ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~85% | ~84% |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
Battery Life
On battery life, both Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 come loaded with large battery cells, and so the user can get through an entire day of moderate use without encountering problems. The A35 5G has a 5000mAh battery; mid-range devices have such capacity, so there is no difference between the two. The Galaxy A25 has the same battery capacity as that of the A35 5G. In the real world, though, battery performance will vary with software optimization, display technology, and power consumption. For example, the A35 5G will consume a little more battery life when the higher refresh rate is active, especially when gaming or otherwise putting a lot of stress on the device, with the 120Hz refresh rate. Conversely, with the A25, its 90Hz refresh rate might reduce stress on the battery, leaving it with more life in a real-world workflow. The two devices, however, do boast Samsung’s adaptive battery technology which means power usage is matched up to one’s usage habits. Users will have a very good battery life for both of these phones; A35 5G has come with more heavy-duty features while the A25 gives a slightly better edge to efficiency, mainly for lightweight usage.
Charging Speed
No doubt, fast charging speed is one factor that people consider when they look for a smartphone. To this factor, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 both carry fast charging. For instance, the A35 5G has a 25W fast charging technique which allows someone enough time if they have a few minutes to spare to charge a phone. It will take roughly 30 minutes if charged from 0 to 50 percent. However, the A25 supports 15W fast charging, and indeed, while not as fast as that of the A35 5G, this is more than enough for most users who don’t mind waiting a little while to get a full charge. The difference between using the A25 and A35 5G is that it will take users a bit longer to get a full charge, but relatively fast when compared to older phones. Both devices feature USB-C charging ports, and in that sense, the A35 5G is more favorable in the context of charging speeds, but for a mid-range device, 15W charger on A25 isn’t bad in any case. Still, charging times depend on specific charging habits and use cases.
Speaker Test
Audio quality is a bit of an issue for both the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25. They have stereo speakers, and for their class, they provide fairly good sound quality. They are clear with mids and highs and get reasonably loud but are not so robust in terms of bass performance. The A35 5G includes stereo speakers supporting Dolby Atmos, giving more immersive sound through videos and gameplay. It usually has good overall balance with great clarity in audio and relatively robust bass. Adding to that are the sound-expanding features brought by Dolby Atmos. The A25 comes with stereo speakers, but not Dolby Atmos. Speakers may be flatter and less immersive compared to the A35 5G even though they offer enough quality to perform their functions in everyday situations. The added features of A35 5G and sound quality make it a preferable device for those users who want great audio. Both handsets come with audio optimization by Samsung, where customers can modify a sound profile for their convenience. However, speakers on the A35 5G sound are more polished and refined.
Performance
In terms of performance, both the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 aim to provide an uninterrupted experience with daily tasks but the A35 5G is stronger as far as processing is concerned. On the inside, the A35 5G features a MediaTek Dimensity 1080 processor- a 5G-capable processor that assures fast performance in games, multi-tasking, and demanding apps. It also boasts of 6GB or 8GB of RAM for most tasks, like playing games up to moderate settings. The A25 is powered by the Exynos 1280 chipset-the processor is also pretty capable for the price it has been placed at, providing decent everyday performance but falls behind in heavy multitasking or gaming scenarios. It comes with up to 4GB or 6GB of RAM, which is basically just enough for basic usage but for power users, not that great. The device will work perfectly, but that’s just what happens in routine activities; the A35 5G is incredibly noticeable when doing difficult applications or multitasking.
Benchmark Performance
To this extent, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G outperformed the benchmarking performance of the Galaxy A25 when they were put in a comparison with each other. According to AnTuTu and Geekbench, single-core and multi-core tests in A35 5G indicate a better result than A25. This can be explained as it has more powerful MediaTek Dimensity 1080 chipset. For instance, scores in single-core in the case of A35 5G will go around 650-700 whereas for multi-core will be within 2100-2300. On the other hand, the score with the Exynos 1280 chipset for A25 will remain within 600-650 and for multi-core around 1700-1900. The Mali-G68 MC4 in the A35 5G is more potent than that available on the A25. Consequently, it will ensure superior graphical performance for games and applications. If used as normally as these devices, the two behave just like each other. However, if benchmark scores are of a greater concern or more significant gaming is being involved, then the A35 5G proves to be the better device.
Camera Comparison
Both the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 carry capable cameras but where the former has an edge is its flexibility and better picture quality. The A35 5G uses 48MP as the main sensor and a 5MP ultra-wide lens, along with a 2MP depth sensor, thus providing many options for shooting. It gives clean, detailed pictures in good light conditions and has good dynamic range. The ultra-wide lens throws wide perspectives, and the depth sensor enables shallow portraits with more clarity by blurring backgrounds. The A25 sports a 50MP main sensor, a 5MP ultra-wide sensor, and a 2MP depth sensor. It is the same setup on the A25 as it is on the A35 5G; however, its photos are usually less sharp in the darker spaces, with decreased detail. The A25’s camera performs reasonably well under good lighting but faltered on dynamic range and low-light performance. The A35 5G supports Night Mode and AI optimization on both phones; however, A35 5G is way ahead in camera performance as an image processing module is much enhanced, along with better software optimisation.
Video Quality
Both the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and A25 shoot video at 1080p at 30fps, which is typical of mid-range smartphones; the A35 5G offers better stabilization due to its more advanced software and hardware. However, with OIS, the footage in the A35 5G is extra-smooth which lessens and evens the shakes during walking shots or camera movement. But on the contrary, the A25 can also record 1080p, although it’s sans OIS; thus videos would appear as though shaky a little or simply not as stabilized during on-moving shooting. For users who value video quality and stability, the A35 5G would be the preferred option. In well-lit environments, the two phones present clear, sharp video, but the A35 5G does better in dynamic situations, with better stabilization.
Verdict
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G – The Better Choice for Most Users
✅The A35 5G is more aligned with the customers, with an even smoother interface, better camera, and far stronger performance.
✅120Hz Super AMOLED Display for smooth scroll and animations.
✅Fast performance coming from the Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset.
✅Improved Camera System with the OIS function for sharper image and steadier video.
✅Bass audio Quality with Dolby Atmos support on a more powerful experience.
✅25W quick charging to pump up the juice in no time.
Samsung Galaxy A25 – The Best Budget Option
This smartphone is an excellent choice for users who need a great reliable smartphone without burning a hole in their pocket.
✅ Decent 90Hz AMOLED display, not as fluid as the A35 5G
✅ Very good battery life, thanks to its efficient processor and display
✅Capable 50MP main camera, but no Optical Image Stabilization.
✅Much more affordably priced, which is a good value-for-money device.
