Here’s a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G Power (2025) and the Honor X8c.
- 📏 Size Comparison
- 🖥️ Display Comparison
- 🔋 Battery Life
- ⚡ Charging Speed
- 🔊 Speaker Test
- 🚀 Performance
- 📊 Benchmark Performance
- 📸 Camera Comparison
- 🎥 Video Quality
- 🏆 Overall Verdict
📏 Size Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 168.4 x 76.5 x 9.4 mm | 162.9 x 74.5 x 7.5 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 179 g |
| Display Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~85.7% | ~86.0% |
| Bezel Size | Slightly thicker bezels | Slimmer bezels |
| Form Factor | Slightly bulkier due to battery size | Slimmer and more compact design |
| Build Material | Plastic frame and back | Plastic frame and back |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm (thicker) | 7.5 mm (slimmer) |
| Ergonomics | Heavier but sturdy feel | Lighter and easier to handle |
🖥️ Display Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Display Size | 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| Display Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels (FHD+) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (FHD+) |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz |
| Pixel Density | ~393 PPI | ~391 PPI |
| Aspect Ratio | 20:9 | 19.9:9 |
| Brightness | ~500 nits (typical) | ~400 nits (typical) |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240Hz | 180Hz |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~85% | ~90% |
| Protection | Water-repellent coating | No official protection |
| HDR Support | No | No |
| Color Accuracy | Good for an LCD panel | Decent, slightly washed out |
🔋 Battery Life
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging Speed | 30W Fast Charging | 35W Fast Charging |
| Battery Type | Li-Po (Non-removable) | Li-Po (Non-removable) |
| Screen-on Time (SOT) | Up to 18-20 hours | Up to 12-14 hours |
| Standby Time | Up to 5-7 days | Up to 3-4 days |
| Power Efficiency | Optimized for long-lasting usage | Decent power efficiency |
| Battery Optimization | Moto Power UI optimizations | Honor Magic UI optimizations |
| Usage Scenarios | – Heavy usage: 2+ days | – Heavy usage: 1-1.5 days |
| – Moderate usage: 3+ days | – Moderate usage: 2 days | |
| – Light usage: 5+ days | – Light usage: 3 days | |
| Charging Time | ~2 hours (0-100%) | ~1.5 hours (0-100%) |
| Battery Health Features | Adaptive charging for longevity | Standard battery health features |
⚡ Charging Speed
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Charging Technology | TurboPower Fast Charging | Honor SuperCharge |
| Wired Charging Speed | Up to 30W | Up to 22.5W |
| Wireless Charging | Not supported | Not supported |
| Charging Time (0-100%) | ~90 minutes (approx.) | ~100 minutes (approx.) |
| Battery Efficiency | Optimized for long-lasting usage | Decent battery optimization |
| Charging Features | – Adaptive charging | – Smart charging |
| – Battery protection features | – Battery protection features |
🔊 Speaker Test
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker Setup | Stereo Speakers | Single Bottom-Firing Speaker |
| Audio Output | Loud and clear with balanced tones | Decent output, but less powerful |
| Bass Performance | Good bass response for a smartphone | Limited bass due to single speaker |
| Clarity | High clarity even at high volumes | Clear at mid-volume, distorts at high volumes |
| Volume Levels | Very loud, suitable for large rooms | Moderate, suitable for small rooms |
| 3.5mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth Audio | Bluetooth 5.3 with AAC, aptX support | Bluetooth 5.1 with AAC support |
| Audio Enhancements | Dolby Atmos support | No dedicated audio enhancements |
| Microphone Quality | Noise-canceling microphones | Standard microphones |
| Speaker Durability | Durable and water-resistant design | Standard design |
🚀 Performance
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| CPU | Octa-core (2×2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & | Octa-core (4×2.4 GHz Cortex-A73 & |
| 6×1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | 4×1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB (expandable via microSD) | 128GB (expandable via microSD) |
| Operating System | Android 14 | Android 12 (Magic UI 6.1) |
| Benchmark Scores | – AnTuTu: ~350,000 | – AnTuTu: ~250,000 |
| – Geekbench 6 (Single/Multi): ~800/2,000 | – Geekbench 6 (Single/Multi): ~400/1,500 | |
| Performance Overview | – Better CPU and GPU performance | – Decent mid-range performance |
| – Handles multitasking and gaming | – Suitable for everyday tasks | |
| smoothly | and light gaming | |
| Gaming Performance | – Can run most games at medium to | – Struggles with heavy games at |
| high settings | high settings | |
| Thermal Management | Efficient cooling system | Standard thermal management |
| Battery Efficiency | Optimized for performance and | Balanced performance and battery |
| battery life | life |
📊 Benchmark Performance
🔹 GeekBench 6
| Device | Single-Core Score | Multi-Core Score |
|---|---|---|
| Moto G Power (2025) | 778 | 2,010 |
| Honor X8c | 470 | 1,543 |
🔹 AnTuTu 10
| Device | Total Score | CPU Score | GPU Score | Memory Score | UX Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moto G Power (2025) | 453,753 | 145,282 | 70,029 | 113,291 | 125,151 |
| Honor X8c | 370,690 | 109,145 | 44,724 | 124,697 | 92,124 |
🔹 3DMark (Wild Life)
| Device | Score | Graphics Test 1 (FPS) |
|---|---|---|
| Moto G Power (2025) | 383 | 1 FPS |
| Honor X8c | 444 | 2 FPS |
📸 Camera Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera Setup | Triple Camera: | Triple Camera: |
| – 50 MP (wide, f/1.8, PDAF) | – 50 MP (wide, f/1.8) | |
| – 8 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) | – 2 MP (depth, f/2.4) | |
| – 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) | – 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) | |
| Front Camera | 16 MP (f/2.4) | 8 MP (f/2.0) |
| Video Recording | – Up to 1080p @ 30/60fps | – Up to 1080p @ 30fps |
| Stabilization | EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) | EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) |
| Camera Features | – Night Vision | – Night mode |
| – HDR | – HDR | |
| – Portrait mode | – Portrait mode | |
| – Ultra-wide shots | – Macro shots | |
| Low-Light Performance | Excellent with Night Vision | Decent with noise reduction |
| Dynamic Range | Good with HDR support | Good for mid-range devices |
| Color Accuracy | Natural and vibrant colors | Natural colors, slightly saturated |
| Additional Features | – Dedicated ultrawide lens | – Dedicated macro lens |
| – Higher resolution front camera | – Simpler front camera setup |
🎥 Video Quality
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | Honor X8c |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Camera Setup | Likely Triple Camera: | Triple Camera: |
| – 50 MP (wide, f/1.8) | – 50 MP (wide, f/1.8) | |
| – 8 MP (ultrawide, f/2.2) | – 2 MP (depth, f/2.4) | |
| – 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) | – 2 MP (macro, f/2.4) | |
| Front Camera | Likely 16 MP (f/2.2) | 8 MP (f/2.0) |
| Video Recording | – Likely up to 4K @ 30fps | – Up to 1080p @ 30fps |
| – 1080p @ 30/60fps | ||
| Stabilization | Likely EIS (Electronic Stabilization) | EIS (Electronic Stabilization) |
| Video Features | – Time-lapse | – Time-lapse |
| – Slow-motion | – Slow-motion | |
| – HDR | – HDR | |
| – Night mode for video (likely) | ||
| Low-Light Performance | Expected to be good with night mode | Decent with noise reduction |
| Dynamic Range | Likely excellent with HDR support | Good for mid-range devices |
| Color Accuracy | Likely vibrant and accurate colors | Natural colors, slightly saturated |
| Audio in Video | Likely stereo sound recording | Mono sound recording |
🏆 Overall Verdict
✅ Pros & Cons
Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
✔️ Pros:
- Excellent battery life (5000mAh, efficient chipset)
- Faster 30W charging
- Stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 6300 processor
- Better camera system (50MP + 8MP ultrawide + OIS)
- 120Hz FHD+ display
❌ Cons:
- No AMOLED display
- Slightly bulkier and heavier
Honor X8c
✔️ Pros:
- Slim and lightweight design
- 5000mAh battery provides good endurance
- Slightly better GPU performance in 3DMark
- Budget-friendly price
❌ Cons:
- Weaker processor (Unisoc T606)
- Lower-resolution 720p display
- Slower charging (22.5W)
- Single speaker (no stereo sound)
- Mediocre camera performance
