Introduction

Some of the most powerful mobile chipsets that are put up for sale in the markets for use by smartphones include Samsung Exynos 9825 and Apple A11 Bionic. Although Samsung Exynos 9825 has a lot to its credit regarding the efficient usage of power and performances even while running numerous applications in the background, Apple A11 Bionic is a bit fussy about how it functions with the help of the integration of other iOS-based devices in delivering excellent performances with better energy management.

The Exynos 9825 was released in 2019 as the latest cutting-edge premium SoC line-up from Samsung, using a new 7nm EUV process for increased efficiency and performance. In Apple, the A11 Bionic that hit the market all the way back in 2017 was the critical step toward AI-enabled functionalities since it was the first to employ the Neural Engine.

By comparison, this structured tabular comparison with two chipsets would bring up some deep analysis regarding the performance, benchmark data, gaming, AI acceleration, and so much more areas. With all these answers to key questions, it then brings forward which chipset better fits into the needs of the consumer.

Comparison: Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A11 Bionic

Feature	Samsung Exynos 9825	Apple A11 Bionic
Release Year	2019	2017
Fabrication Process	7nm EUV	10nm FinFET
CPU Architecture	Octa-core (2+2+4)	Hexa-core (2+4)
Clock Speed	2x 2.73 GHz + 2x 2.4 GHz + 4x 1.9 GHz	2x 2.39 GHz + 4x 1.3 GHz
GPU	Mali-G76 MP12	Apple Custom GPU (3-core)
AI Accelerator	Yes (NPU)	Yes (Neural Engine)
Memory Support	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X
Max Camera Support	22 MP (Single), 16+16 MP (Dual)	12 MP (Single/Dual)
AnTuTu 10 Score	~400,000	~300,000
GeekBench 6 Score	Single: ~900, Multi: ~2,800	Single: ~950, Multi: ~2,400
Power Efficiency	Better due to 7nm	Moderate (10nm)

Specifications

Specification	Samsung Exynos 9825	Apple A11 Bionic
Launch Year	2019	2017
Process Node	7nm EUV	10nm FinFET
CPU Details	2x Mongoose 4 + 2x Cortex-A75 + 4x Cortex-A55	2x Monsoon + 4x Mistral
GPU	Mali-G76 MP12	Apple Custom 3-core
RAM Support	Up to 12GB LPDDR4X	Up to 4GB LPDDR4X
AI Features	Integrated NPU	Integrated Neural Engine
ISP Support	22 MP single, 16+16 MP dual	12 MP single/dual
Display Support	Up to 4K UHD	Up to 4K UHD
Storage Type	UFS 3.0	NVMe
Connectivity	4G LTE, Wi-Fi 6	4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5
Battery Efficiency	Advanced (7nm)	Decent (10nm)

Review

Aspect	Exynos 9825	Apple A11 Bionic
Performance	High performance	Competitive but slower
Gaming	Smooth with Mali-G76	Smooth but fewer cores
AI Performance	Efficient NPU	Optimized Neural Engine
Power Efficiency	More efficient (7nm)	Less efficient (10nm)
Camera Support	High resolution support	Moderate resolution
Thermal Management	Good	Good

Benchmarks

AnTuTu 10

Test	Exynos 9825	Apple A11 Bionic
Overall Score	~400,000	~300,000
CPU Score	~110,000	~90,000
GPU Score	~150,000	~130,000
Memory Score	~70,000	~50,000
UX Score	~70,000	~30,000

GeekBench 6

Test	Exynos 9825	Apple A11 Bionic
Single-Core	~900	~950
Multi-Core	~2,800	~2,400

Smartphones

Chipset	Smartphones
Exynos 9825	Samsung Galaxy Note 10, Note 10+
Apple A11 Bionic	iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X

Questions and Opinions: Samsung Exynos 9825 vs. Apple A11 Bionic

Which chipset is more powerful?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 offers better performance overall, especially in multitasking and gaming.
Which one is newer?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 (2019) is two years newer than Apple A11 Bionic (2017).
Which chipset is more energy-efficient?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 is more efficient, thanks to its 7nm EUV process.
Which is better for gaming?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825, with its Mali-G76 GPU, provides smoother gaming.
Which has better AI performance?
- Opinion: Both are strong, but Exynos 9825’s NPU delivers faster AI computations.
Which chipset scores higher in benchmarks?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 generally outperforms Apple A11 Bionic in both AnTuTu and GeekBench.
Which has better camera support?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 supports higher-resolution cameras (up to 22 MP single or 16+16 MP dual).
Which one supports more RAM?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 supports up to 12GB RAM, while Apple A11 Bionic is limited to 4GB.
Which is better for iPhone users?
- Opinion: Apple A11 Bionic is optimized for iOS, making it perfect for iPhones.
Which chipset should I choose for long-term use?
Opinion: Exynos 9825 is a better choice for future-proofing, with its advanced manufacturing and higher efficiency.