Introduction
Some of the most powerful mobile chipsets that are put up for sale in the markets for use by smartphones include Samsung Exynos 9825 and Apple A11 Bionic. Although Samsung Exynos 9825 has a lot to its credit regarding the efficient usage of power and performances even while running numerous applications in the background, Apple A11 Bionic is a bit fussy about how it functions with the help of the integration of other iOS-based devices in delivering excellent performances with better energy management.
The Exynos 9825 was released in 2019 as the latest cutting-edge premium SoC line-up from Samsung, using a new 7nm EUV process for increased efficiency and performance. In Apple, the A11 Bionic that hit the market all the way back in 2017 was the critical step toward AI-enabled functionalities since it was the first to employ the Neural Engine.
By comparison, this structured tabular comparison with two chipsets would bring up some deep analysis regarding the performance, benchmark data, gaming, AI acceleration, and so much more areas. With all these answers to key questions, it then brings forward which chipset better fits into the needs of the consumer.
Comparison: Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A11 Bionic
| Feature | Samsung Exynos 9825 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Release Year | 2019 | 2017 |
| Fabrication Process | 7nm EUV | 10nm FinFET |
| CPU Architecture | Octa-core (2+2+4) | Hexa-core (2+4) |
| Clock Speed | 2x 2.73 GHz + 2x 2.4 GHz + 4x 1.9 GHz | 2x 2.39 GHz + 4x 1.3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Apple Custom GPU (3-core) |
| AI Accelerator | Yes (NPU) | Yes (Neural Engine) |
| Memory Support | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Max Camera Support | 22 MP (Single), 16+16 MP (Dual) | 12 MP (Single/Dual) |
| AnTuTu 10 Score | ~400,000 | ~300,000 |
| GeekBench 6 Score | Single: ~900, Multi: ~2,800 | Single: ~950, Multi: ~2,400 |
| Power Efficiency | Better due to 7nm | Moderate (10nm) |
Specifications
| Specification | Samsung Exynos 9825 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Launch Year | 2019 | 2017 |
| Process Node | 7nm EUV | 10nm FinFET |
| CPU Details | 2x Mongoose 4 + 2x Cortex-A75 + 4x Cortex-A55 | 2x Monsoon + 4x Mistral |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Apple Custom 3-core |
| RAM Support | Up to 12GB LPDDR4X | Up to 4GB LPDDR4X |
| AI Features | Integrated NPU | Integrated Neural Engine |
| ISP Support | 22 MP single, 16+16 MP dual | 12 MP single/dual |
| Display Support | Up to 4K UHD | Up to 4K UHD |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.0 | NVMe |
| Connectivity | 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 6 | 4G LTE, Wi-Fi 5 |
| Battery Efficiency | Advanced (7nm) | Decent (10nm) |
Review
| Aspect | Exynos 9825 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | High performance | Competitive but slower |
| Gaming | Smooth with Mali-G76 | Smooth but fewer cores |
| AI Performance | Efficient NPU | Optimized Neural Engine |
| Power Efficiency | More efficient (7nm) | Less efficient (10nm) |
| Camera Support | High resolution support | Moderate resolution |
| Thermal Management | Good | Good |
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 10
| Test | Exynos 9825 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | ~400,000 | ~300,000 |
| CPU Score | ~110,000 | ~90,000 |
| GPU Score | ~150,000 | ~130,000 |
| Memory Score | ~70,000 | ~50,000 |
| UX Score | ~70,000 | ~30,000 |
GeekBench 6
| Test | Exynos 9825 | Apple A11 Bionic |
|---|---|---|
| Single-Core | ~900 | ~950 |
| Multi-Core | ~2,800 | ~2,400 |
Smartphones
| Chipset | Smartphones |
|---|---|
| Exynos 9825 | Samsung Galaxy Note 10, Note 10+ |
| Apple A11 Bionic | iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X |
Questions and Opinions: Samsung Exynos 9825 vs. Apple A11 Bionic
- Which chipset is more powerful?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 offers better performance overall, especially in multitasking and gaming.
- Which one is newer?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 (2019) is two years newer than Apple A11 Bionic (2017).
- Which chipset is more energy-efficient?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 is more efficient, thanks to its 7nm EUV process.
- Which is better for gaming?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825, with its Mali-G76 GPU, provides smoother gaming.
- Which has better AI performance?
- Opinion: Both are strong, but Exynos 9825’s NPU delivers faster AI computations.
- Which chipset scores higher in benchmarks?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 generally outperforms Apple A11 Bionic in both AnTuTu and GeekBench.
- Which has better camera support?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 supports higher-resolution cameras (up to 22 MP single or 16+16 MP dual).
- Which one supports more RAM?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 supports up to 12GB RAM, while Apple A11 Bionic is limited to 4GB.
- Which is better for iPhone users?
- Opinion: Apple A11 Bionic is optimized for iOS, making it perfect for iPhones.
- Which chipset should I choose for long-term use?
- Opinion: Exynos 9825 is a better choice for future-proofing, with its advanced manufacturing and higher efficiency.
