Table of Contents
- Size Comparison
- Display Comparison
- Battery Life
- Charging Speed
- Speaker Test
- Performance
- Benchmark Performance
- Camera Comparison
- Video Quality
- Verdict
In the ever-evolving landscape of smartphones, two titans stand at the forefront: Samsung’s Galaxy S25 and Apple’s iPhone 16. Both devices represent the pinnacle of their respective companies’ technological advancements, catering to a diverse global audience. This comprehensive comparison delves into various aspects of these flagship models to assist potential buyers in making an informed decision.
Size Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S25 measures 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm and weighs 162 grams, making it slightly more compact and lighter than the iPhone 16, which measures 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm and weighs 170 grams. The Galaxy S25’s slimmer profile and reduced weight may appeal to users seeking a more lightweight device.
Here’s a size comparison table for the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Apple iPhone 16:
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 146.9 x 70.5 x 7.2 mm | 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm |
| Weight | 162g | 170g |
| Screen Size | 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S25 features a 6.2-inch Dynamic AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 2,600 nits. In contrast, the iPhone 16 sports a 6.1-inch OLED display with a 60Hz refresh rate and a peak brightness of 2,000 nits. The higher refresh rate and brightness of the Galaxy S25 may offer a smoother and more vibrant viewing experience.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Display Type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Super Retina XDR (OLED) |
| Screen Size | 6.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| Resolution | 2340 x 1080 pixels (FHD+) | 2532 x 1170 pixels (FHD+) |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz (Adaptive) | 60Hz |
| Brightness | Up to 2,600 nits (peak) | Up to 2,000 nits (peak) |
| HDR Support | HDR10+ | HDR10, Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~89% | ~86% |
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 3 | Ceramic Shield |
Battery Life
The Galaxy S25 is equipped with a 4,000 mAh battery, while the iPhone 16 houses a 3,561 mAh battery. Although the Galaxy S25 has a larger battery capacity, actual battery life can vary based on usage patterns and system optimization. Users should consider their daily usage to determine which device better suits their needs.
Here’s a battery life comparison between the Samsung Galaxy S25 and Apple iPhone 16.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 4,000 mAh | 3,561 mAh |
| Battery Life (Typical Usage) | ~24-28 hours | ~22-26 hours |
| Screen-on Time | ~9-10 hours | ~8-9 hours |
| Standby Time | Up to 72 hours | Up to 65 hours |
| Power Efficiency | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (Optimized for Efficiency) | A18 Bionic (Highly Optimized) |
Charging Speed
In terms of charging capabilities, the Galaxy S25 supports 25W wired charging and 15W wireless charging. The iPhone 16 supports 20W wired charging, 25W MagSafe wireless charging, and 15W Qi2 wireless charging. The iPhone 16’s faster wireless charging options may be advantageous for users who prefer cable-free charging solutions.
Charging Speed Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Wired Charging Speed | 25W (USB-C) | 20W (USB-C) |
| Wireless Charging Speed | 15W (Qi2) | 15W (Qi2), 25W (MagSafe) |
| Reverse Wireless Charging | Yes (4.5W) | No |
| Full Charge Time (0-100%) | ~60 minutes | ~75 minutes |
| 50% Charge Time | ~25 minutes | ~30 minutes |
Speaker Test
Both devices are equipped with stereo speakers designed to deliver immersive audio experiences. While specific decibel levels and audio quality metrics are not detailed in the available sources, both Samsung and Apple have historically prioritized high-quality audio in their flagship models. Users can expect clear and balanced sound from both devices.
Speaker Test Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16.
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Speaker Setup | Stereo Speakers (Bottom + Earpiece) | Stereo Speakers (Bottom + Earpiece) |
| Dolby Atmos Support | Yes | Yes |
| Max Loudness (dB) | ~88-90 dB | ~85-88 dB |
| Audio Quality | Rich bass, clear mids & highs | Balanced sound with crisp vocals |
| Spatial Audio | Yes | Yes (with Dolby Atmos) |
| 3.5mm Jack | No | No |
Performance
The Galaxy S25 is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite processor paired with 12GB of RAM, while the iPhone 16 utilizes Apple’s A18 chip coupled with 8GB of RAM. Both devices are engineered to handle demanding tasks efficiently, but the Galaxy S25’s higher RAM may offer an edge in multitasking scenarios.
Performance Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) | A18 Bionic (3nm) |
| CPU Cores | Octa-core (1x 3.3GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x 3.2GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x 2.3GHz Cortex-A520) | Hexa-core (2x high-performance + 4x efficiency cores) |
| GPU | Adreno 750 | Apple GPU (6-core) |
| RAM | 12GB LPDDR5X | 8GB LPDDR5 |
| Storage Options | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB |
| OS | Android 14 (One UI 6) | iOS 18 |
| AI & Machine Learning | Samsung Galaxy AI | Apple Neural Engine |
Benchmark Performance
While specific benchmark scores are not provided in the available sources, both the Snapdragon 8 Elite and the A18 chip are top-tier processors in the smartphone industry. Historically, Apple’s chips have excelled in single-core performance, while Qualcomm’s processors have demonstrated strong multi-core capabilities. Users interested in gaming or resource-intensive applications may want to consult detailed benchmark reports for a more nuanced comparison.
Benchmark Performance: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16
| Benchmark | Samsung Galaxy S25 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3) | Apple iPhone 16 (A18 Bionic) |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu Score | ~1.5 million | ~1.7 million |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | ~2,200 | ~2,800 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | ~7,400 | ~9,000 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | ~3,800 | ~4,500 |
| GFXBench Aztec Ruins (FPS) | ~110 FPS | ~130 FPS |
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy S25 boasts a triple-camera setup, including a 50MP main sensor, a 12MP ultra-wide lens, and a 10MP telephoto lens with 3x optical zoom. The iPhone 16 features a dual-camera system comprising a 48MP main sensor and a 12MP ultra-wide lens. The additional telephoto lens on the Galaxy S25 provides enhanced zoom capabilities, which may be beneficial for users who frequently capture distant subjects.
Camera Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 50MP (f/1.8) | 48MP (f/1.6) |
| Ultra-Wide Camera | 12MP (f/2.2) | 12MP (f/2.4) |
| Telephoto Camera | 10MP (f/2.4), 3x Optical Zoom | No Telephoto Lens |
| Front Camera | 12MP (f/2.2) | 12MP (f/1.9) |
| Optical Zoom | 3x Optical, 30x Digital | Digital Zoom only |
| Night Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Pro Mode | Yes (Full Manual Controls) | Limited Manual Controls |
| AI Enhancements | Galaxy AI Image Processing | Apple Photonic Engine |
Video Quality
Both smartphones are capable of recording high-quality video content. The Galaxy S25 supports 8K video recording at 24/30fps, while the iPhone 16 offers 4K recording at various frame rates, including 24/25/30/60fps. The Galaxy S25’s ability to record in 8K provides higher resolution footage, though it also requires more storage space. Users should consider their video recording preferences and storage needs when choosing between the two.
Video Quality Comparison: Samsung Galaxy S25 vs. Apple iPhone 16
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy S25 | Apple iPhone 16 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 8K at 30fps | 4K at 60fps |
| Slow-Motion Video | 1080p at 960fps | 1080p at 240fps |
| HDR Video | HDR10+ | Dolby Vision HDR |
| Cinematic Mode | No | Yes (4K at 30fps) |
| Pro Video Mode | Yes (Full Manual Controls) | Limited Manual Settings |
| Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) | Yes (Main & Telephoto) | Yes (Main & Ultra-Wide) |
| Zoom in Video | 3x Optical, 30x Digital | Digital Zoom Only |
| Audio Recording | Stereo Recording | Spatial Audio Recording |
🏆 Overall Verdict
📌 Where the Samsung Galaxy S25 Wins:
✅ Display: 120Hz refresh rate for smoother animations and higher brightness (2,600 nits).
✅ Battery & Charging: Larger battery (4,000mAh) and faster wired charging (25W).
✅ Camera Zoom: Dedicated 3x optical zoom & 30x digital zoom, better for distant shots.
✅ Video Resolution: 8K video recording for ultra-high-definition content.
✅ Customization & Features: More control over UI with One UI 6 and Samsung AI features.
✅ Multitasking: 12GB RAM allows smoother performance in multiple apps & gaming.
✅ Reverse Wireless Charging: Can charge accessories like Galaxy Buds and smartwatches.
📌 Where the Apple iPhone 16 Wins:
✅ Performance: A18 Bionic chip is the most powerful, leading in speed and efficiency.
✅ Software Optimization: iOS 18 is smoother, more stable, and gets longer software updates.
✅ Video Quality: Cinematic Mode (4K) and Dolby Vision HDR offer superior video recording.
✅ Ecosystem: Seamless integration with MacBooks, iPads, Apple Watch, and AirPods.
✅ Build Quality: Premium Ceramic Shield glass and tighter iOS security.
✅ MagSafe Charging: Faster wireless charging (25W) with MagSafe accessories support.
