Xiaomi Poco C75 vs. Samsung Galaxy A06 5G

Xiaomi Poco C75 vs. Samsung Galaxy A06 5G

Here’s a comprehensive comparison between the Xiaomi Poco C75 and the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G.

📑 Table of Contents:

  • 📏 Size Comparison
  • 🖥️ Display Comparison
  • 🔋 Battery Life
  • ⚡ Charging Speed
  • 🔊 Speaker Test
  • 🚀 Performance
  • 📊 Benchmark Performance
  • 📸 Camera Comparison
  • 🎥 Video Quality
  • 🏆 Overall Verdict

📏 Size Comparison

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Dimensions 168.6 x 76.3 x 8.3 mm 167.2 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm
Weight 195 g 195 g
Display Size 6.74 inches 6.6 inches
Display Type IPS LCD PLS LCD
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+) 720 x 1612 pixels (HD+)
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio ~84.5% ~81.8%
Build Material Plastic back, plastic frame Plastic back, plastic frame
Colors Black, Blue, Purple Black, Blue, White




🖥️ Display Comparison

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Display Type IPS LCD PLS LCD
Screen Size 6.74 inches 6.5 inches
Resolution 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+) 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+)
Pixel Density ~260 PPI ~270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90Hz 60Hz
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Brightness ~450 nits (typical) ~400 nits (typical)
Touch Sampling Rate 120Hz 60Hz
Screen Protection Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified) No specific protection
Bezel/Notch Waterdrop notch Infinity-V notch
Color Accuracy Standard (no specific certification) Standard (no specific certification)

🔋 Battery Life

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging Speed 18W Fast Charging 15W Fast Charging
Battery Type Li-Po (Non-removable) Li-Po (Non-removable)
Screen-on Time (SOT) Up to 10-12 hours (approx.) Up to 8-10 hours (approx.)
Standby Time Up to 2-3 days (light usage) Up to 1-2 days (light usage)
Usage Scenarios Heavy usage: 1.5-2 days Heavy usage: 1-1.5 days
Charging Time ~2 hours (0-100%) ~2.5 hours (0-100%)
Power Efficiency Optimized for long-lasting performance Moderate power efficiency
Software Optimization MIUI optimization for battery saving One UI optimization for battery saving
Battery Features AI-based power management, Battery Saver Adaptive Battery, Power Saving Mode

⚡ Charging Speed

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging Speed 18W Fast Charging 15W Adaptive Fast Charging
Charging Port USB-C USB-C
Charging Time (0-100%) ~2 hours (approx.) ~2.5 hours (approx.)
Included Charger 18W charger in the box 15W charger in the box
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging No No




🔊 Speaker Test

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Speaker Type Single bottom-firing speaker Single bottom-firing speaker
Loudness Good (above average for budget phones) Average (sufficient for basic use)
Sound Quality Clear mids, decent bass for its price Flat sound profile, lacks bass
Audio Enhancements MIUI audio optimizations Basic sound tuning
3.5mm Headphone Jack Yes Yes
Bluetooth Audio Bluetooth 5.3 (supports AAC, SBC codecs) Bluetooth 5.1 (supports AAC, SBC codecs)
Stereo Support No No
Volume Levels High volume output Moderate volume output
Bass Performance Slightly better bass response Weak bass
Clarity Good clarity at high volumes Average clarity, distorts at high volumes

🚀 Performance

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Processor MediaTek Helio G36 MediaTek Dimensity 700 (5G)
CPU Octa-core (4×2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 + 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (2×2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G57 MC2
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB (varies by region) 4GB / 6GB (varies by region)
Storage 64GB / 128GB (expandable via microSD) 64GB / 128GB (expandable via microSD)
Operating System Android 13 (MIUI 14) Android 13 (One UI Core 5.1)
5G Support No Yes
Benchmark Scores Antutu: ~120,000 Antutu: ~350,000
Gaming Performance Basic gaming (lightweight games) Better gaming performance (mid-range games)
Thermal Management Basic cooling Basic cooling

📊 Benchmark Performance

Benchmark Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
🔹 GeekBench 6 (Single-Core) 744 408
🔹 GeekBench 6 (Multi-Core) 1,893 1,162
🔹 AnTuTu 10 420,000 274,000
🔹 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme 1,550 1,408




📸 Camera Comparison

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Rear Camera Setup Dual Camera Dual Camera
Main Camera 50 MP (f/1.8, wide) 50 MP (f/1.8, wide)
Secondary Camera 2 MP depth sensor 2 MP depth sensor
Video Recording Up to 1080p @ 30fps Up to 1080p @ 30fps
Stabilization EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization) No stabilization
Front Camera 8 MP (f/2.0) 8 MP (f/2.0)
Front Video Recording 1080p @ 30fps 1080p @ 30fps
Camera Features AI Scene Detection, Night Mode, Filters Basic Filters
Video Features Time-Lapse, Slow Motion Basic Video Features
Audio in Video Stereo recording Mono recording
Software Enhancements AI Enhancements, HDR Basic Software Processing

🎥 Video Quality

Feature Xiaomi Poco C75 Samsung Galaxy A06 5G
Rear Camera Setup Dual Camera Dual Camera
Main Camera 50 MP (f/1.8, wide) 50 MP (f/1.8, wide)
Secondary Camera 2 MP depth sensor 2 MP depth sensor
Video Recording Up to 1080p @ 30fps Up to 1080p @ 30fps
Stabilization No stabilization No stabilization
Front Camera 8 MP (f/2.0) 8 MP (f/2.0)
Front Video Recording 1080p @ 30fps 1080p @ 30fps
Video Features Time-Lapse, Slow Motion Basic Video Features
Audio in Video Mono recording Mono recording
Software Enhancements Basic Filters Basic Filters




🏆 Overall Verdict

🔹 Pros & Cons

✅ Xiaomi Poco C75 – Pros:

✔️ 120Hz refresh rate display for smoother scrolling
✔️ Faster MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra processor
✔️ Better battery life with 33W fast charging
✔️ Loud stereo speakers
✔️ Higher GeekBench & AnTuTu scores
✔️ Higher-resolution front camera (13MP vs 8MP)

⛔ Xiaomi Poco C75 – Cons:

❌ No AMOLED display
❌ Slightly heavier

✅ Samsung Galaxy A06 5G – Pros:

✔️ Lighter weight & slightly more compact
✔️ Samsung One UI software & updates
✔️ Decent battery life

⛔ Samsung Galaxy A06 5G – Cons:

Lower 60Hz refresh rate display
Weaker Helio G85 processor
Slower 15W charging speed
Lower benchmark scores
Single speaker instead of stereo

[post-views]

Customer Reviews

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related