Certainly! Below is a detailed comparison between the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G.
Table of Contents
- Size Comparison
- Display Comparison
- Battery Life
- Charging Speed
- Speaker Test
- Performance
- Benchmark Performance
- Camera Comparison
- Video Quality
- Overall Verdict
Size Comparison
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Height | ~160.5 mm | ~161.3 mm |
Width | ~75.1 mm | ~75.5 mm |
Thickness | ~8.1 mm | ~7.9 mm |
Weight | ~186 g | ~180 g |
Build Material | Plastic Frame, Glass Back | Plastic Frame, Glass Back |
Display Size | 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
Screen-to-Body Ratio | ~84% | ~83% |
Curved Display | No | No |
Bezel Thickness | Minimal bezels (~2mm top/bottom, ~1.5mm sides) | Minimal bezels (~2.2mm top/bottom, ~1.6mm sides) |
Display Comparison
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Display Type | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
Size | 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
Resolution | FHD+ (2400 x 1080) | FHD+ (2400 x 1080) |
Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 90Hz |
Brightness | ~800 nits (peak) | ~600 nits (peak) |
Contrast Ratio | Infinite | Infinite |
Color Gamut | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Gorilla Glass | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
Eye Comfort | Yes | Yes |
Always-On Display | Yes | No |
Battery Life
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
Endurance Rating | ~90 hours (moderate use) | ~85 hours (moderate use) |
Standby Time | ~300 hours | ~280 hours |
Talk Time | ~24 hours | ~22 hours |
Video Playback | ~16 hours | ~14 hours |
Music Playback | ~70 hours | ~65 hours |
Charging Technology | Fast Charging (25W) | Fast Charging (25W) |
Wireless Charging | No | No |
Reverse Wireless Charging | No | No |
Charging Speed
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Battery Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh |
Wired Charging Speed | 25W | 25W |
Wireless Charging | No | No |
Reverse Charging | No | No |
Charge Time (0-100%) | ~1 hour 15 minutes | ~1 hour 20 minutes |
Fast Charging Technology | Adaptive Fast Charging | Adaptive Fast Charging |
USB Type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
Charger Included | Yes (25W charger included) | Yes (25W charger included) |
Speaker Test
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Speaker Type | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Loudness | ~85 dB | ~80 dB |
Sound Quality | Good bass, clear mids | Average bass, clear mids |
Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Audio Output Power | 1.2W | 1.0W |
Noise Cancellation | Yes | No |
Audio Formats Supported | MP3, AAC, FLAC, WAV | MP3, AAC, FLAC, WAV |
Microphone Count | Dual Microphones | Dual Microphones |
Wind Noise Reduction | Yes | Yes |
Performance
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Processor | Exynos 1280 | Snapdragon 695 |
RAM Options | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB |
Storage Options | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB |
Operating System | Android 12 with One UI Core 4.1 | Android 13 with One UI Core 5.1 |
Software Updates | Up to 4 years of OS updates | Up to 3 years of OS updates |
GPU | Mali-G68 | Adreno 610 |
AI Capabilities | Yes | Yes |
Multi-tasking | Smooth | Decent |
Gaming Performance | Good | Average |
Thermal Management | Efficient | Moderate |
Benchmark Performance
Benchmark Tool | Test Type | ||
|---|---|---|---|
GeekBench 6 | Single-core | 800 | 700 |
Multi-core | 2400 | 2000 | |
Antutu 10 | Overall Score | 350,000 | 300,000 |
3DMark | Wild Life Extreme | 1500 | 1200 |
Camera Comparison
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Rear Cameras | 64MP Main (f/1.8- 12MP Ultra-wide (f/2.2)- 5MP Macro (f/2.4)- 5MP Depth (f/2.4) | 50MP Main (f/1.8)- 8MP Ultra-wide (f/2.2)- 2MP Depth (f/2.4) |
Front Camera | 32MP (f/2.5) | 13MP (f/2.4) |
Video Recording | 4K @ 30fps | 4K @ 30fps |
Stabilization | EIS | EIS |
Low-Light Performance | Excellent | Good |
Slow Motion | 1080p @ 120fps | 720p @ 120fps |
HDR Support | Yes | Yes |
Night Mode | Yes | Yes |
Pro Mode | Yes | Yes |
Other Features | – Scene Optimizer- Food Mode- Single Take- Customizable controls | – Scene Optimizer- Food Mode- Single Take- Customizable controls |
Flash Type | LED Flash | LED Flash |
Video Quality
Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
Maximum Resolution | 4K @ 30fps | 4K @ 30fps |
Stabilization | Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) | Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) |
Low-Light Performance | Excellent | Good |
Slow Motion | 1080p @ 120fps | 720p @ 120fps |
HDR Support | HDR10+ | HDR10+ |
Video Recording Features | Night Mode- Pro Mode- Time Lapse | Night Mode- Pro Mode- Time Lapse |
Audio Quality | Stereo Speakers | Stereo Speakers |
Microphone Count | Quad Microphones | Dual Microphones |
Wind Noise Reduction | Yes | Yes |
Focus Speed | Very Fast | Fast |
Color Accuracy | Very High | High |
Dynamic Range | Extremely Wide | Wide |
Overall Verdict
Pros and Cons
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
Pros:
✅Better Performance: Equipped with the Exynos 1280 processor, which is more powerful than the A35’s chipset.
✅Superior Display: Features a 6.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate for smoother visuals.
✅Premium Design: Sleeker design with a glossy finish and a more modern look.
✅Camera Quality: Better camera setup with a 64MP main sensor, offering sharper and more detailed photos.
✅Software Support: Guaranteed 4 years of major Android updates and 5 years of security updates.
✅Battery Life: 5,000mAh battery with efficient power management for all-day usage.
✅IP67 Rating: Dust and water resistance, which is rare in this price range.
Cons:
❌Higher Price: More expensive than the A35 5G.
❌No Headphone Jack: Lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, which may be a downside for some users.
❌Plastic Build: Despite the premium design, it still uses a plastic back.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Pros:
✅Affordable Price: More budget-friendly than the A53 5G, making it a great value-for-money option.
✅Good Display: Features a 6.6-inch Super AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate, which is still smooth and vibrant.
✅Decent Performance: Powered by a mid-range processor (likely Exynos 1280 or similar), which is sufficient for everyday tasks.
✅Battery Life: 5,000mAh battery with solid battery life for all-day use.
✅Software Support: Also comes with 4 years of major Android updates and 5 years of security updates.
✅Headphone Jack: Retains the 3.5mm headphone jack, which is a plus for wired audio users.
Cons:
❌Lower Refresh Rate: 90Hz display compared to the A53’s 120Hz, which may feel less smooth.
❌Basic Camera Setup: Features a 48MP main sensor, which is good but not as sharp as the A53’s 64MP sensor.
❌No IP Rating: Lacks water and dust resistance, which is a notable omission.
❌Bulkier Design: Slightly thicker and heavier than the A53 5G.
